City’s New Curfew Sparks Applause—and Some Resistance
Lexile: 1240 | Grade: 12
Passage
In what officials are calling a major step toward restoring peace and order, the City Council voted 6-1 this week to impose a new curfew for minors under the age of 18. The ordinance, which takes effect next Monday, prohibits teens from being in public spaces after 9:00 PM on school nights and 10:00 PM on weekends, unless accompanied by a parent or guardian.
Mayor Lydia Barnes praised the decision as 'bold and overdue.' She noted that recent months have seen a sharp rise in 'teen-centered disturbances,' citing loitering, loud music in parks, and a few isolated instances of vandalism. 'This isn’t about punishment—it’s about prevention,' she said during a press briefing. 'Responsible teens won’t mind a policy that protects the community’s peace.'
Supporters of the measure include several local business owners who claim the late-evening crowds have made customers feel unsafe. 'It’s not about blaming kids—it’s about maintaining order,' said Peter Groves, who owns a downtown café. 'We’re not trying to be harsh. We’re trying to protect the atmosphere of the city.'
Some parents have applauded the move as well. 'I’m glad the city is stepping in,' said Tanisha Rudd, a mother of three. 'I work late shifts, and knowing my teenagers have a legal reason to be home gives me peace of mind.'
The lone dissenting vote on the council came from Elise Chang, who expressed concern about enforcement fairness. 'We need to make sure this doesn’t disproportionately target certain neighborhoods or create unnecessary interactions between teens and law enforcement,' she said. The Council did not comment on her concerns, nor were any teen voices included in the final hearing.
While the ordinance has generated strong support from officials and select members of the public, youth advocates have raised questions online about autonomy and criminalization. So far, city leaders have dismissed the criticism as a 'vocal minority.'
Printable Comprehension Practice
Visit us at https://readbuddies.com to practice interactively, track your progress, and explore more comprehension passages.
Questions
Q1: Which of the following reveals a bias in how this article presents the curfew policy?
- A. It mentions that the policy begins next Monday
- B. It quotes only supporters in positions of power and limits dissenting voices
- C. It states the vote count from the City Council
- D. It includes direct quotes from public officials
Q2: What tone does the article use to describe the curfew?
- A. Sarcastic and mocking
- B. Objective and analytical
- C. Supportive and reassuring
- D. Apathetic and vague
Q3: Which sentence most clearly signals the article’s bias?
- A. 'The ordinance, which takes effect next Monday, prohibits teens from being in public spaces after 9:00 PM...'
- B. 'Mayor Lydia Barnes praised the decision as “bold and overdue.”'
- C. 'Responsible teens won’t mind a policy that protects the community’s peace.'
- D. 'Council did not comment on her concerns.'
Q4: How could this article be made more balanced?
- A. By adding more praise from city officials
- B. By including quotes from teenagers or youth advocates
- C. By extending the article length
- D. By focusing more on business owners’ opinions
Q5: What is the likely purpose of this article?
- A. To explore both sides of the youth curfew debate
- B. To inform the public while subtly encouraging support for the new policy
- C. To criticize city government policies
- D. To entertain readers with city gossip
Printable Comprehension Practice
Visit us at https://readbuddies.com to practice interactively, track your progress, and explore more comprehension passages.
Answers & Reasoning
Q1: Which of the following reveals a bias in how this article presents the curfew policy?
✅ Correct Answer: B
💡 Reasoning: The article heavily quotes those who support the policy while minimizing or overlooking detailed perspectives from critics, especially teens.
Q2: What tone does the article use to describe the curfew?
✅ Correct Answer: C
💡 Reasoning: The article uses positive language and quotes from officials that frame the curfew as necessary and beneficial, creating a supportive tone.
Q3: Which sentence most clearly signals the article’s bias?
✅ Correct Answer: C
💡 Reasoning: This sentence assumes that support equals responsibility, framing opposition as immature or unwise, which reveals bias.
Q4: How could this article be made more balanced?
✅ Correct Answer: B
💡 Reasoning: To achieve balance, the article should represent voices most affected by the curfew—teens and those who may oppose it for valid reasons.
Q5: What is the likely purpose of this article?
✅ Correct Answer: B
💡 Reasoning: Although it appears informational, the article leans toward supporting the curfew by selectively quoting and framing the issue in a favorable light.
Printable Comprehension Practice
Visit us at https://readbuddies.com to practice interactively, track your progress, and explore more comprehension passages.